Enron Mail

From:scott.pleus@enron.com
To:mark.friedman@enron.com, jeremy.mills@enron.com, danae.umbower@enron.com,molly.lafuze@enron.com
Subject:Bandwidth Trading Forum
Cc:sally.beck@enron.com
Bcc:sally.beck@enron.com
Date:Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:20:00 -0800 (PST)


Telecom Companies Mtg To Discuss Bandwidth Trading
By Michael Rieke

03/23/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright © 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- A group of telecommunications companies is meeting
Thursday to open discussions
on industry standards for bandwidth trading.

Set up by CompTel, a Washington, D.C., trade association that represents the
competitive telecommunications
industry, the meeting will initiate discussion among companies that are or
probably will be active in a nascent
bandwidth trading market that could be worth billions or trillions of
dollars a year.

Bandwidth is the capacity to move data over telecommunications networks.

Russell Frisby Jr., president of CompTel, told Dow Jones Newswires that the
trade group's members asked it to
get involved in the discussion of bandwidth trading.

The fact that CompTel is involved in discussion on bandwidth trading shows
that people are taking the idea
seriously, said Steven Kamman, a telecommunications analyst with CIBC World
Markets.

"This year bandwidth trading will move from a theory to practice," he said.

Before that can happen, the industry needs to set ground rules for trading,
and that will be a major topic of
discussion at the meeting.

It comes as no surprise that Enron Corp. (ENE) will be at the meeting. For
nearly a year, the company has been
promoting the idea of setting up a liquid market for trading bandwidth under
standard terms and conditions.

Tom Gros, vice president of global bandwidth trading for Enron, has two
items he thinks should be at the top of
the meeting's agenda.

The first is establishing an industry organization to set the standard terms
and conditions for trading bandwidth as
a commodity. The second is setting a North American benchmark for trading.

The bandwidth trading organization, or BTO, should consist of companies
"with actual financial risk" in
bandwidth trading, Gros said. That means the group would consist mainly of
major telecommunications carriers,
the bandwidth producers.

But others also have financial risk in bandwidth, he said, including some
major Wall Street players and bandwidth
consumers.

Gros said some Wall Street players have already begun trading bandwidth, but
he wouldn't identify them. A
source with a Wall Street investment bank, who didn't want to be identified,
said Gros's claim was a stretch.

Banks with trading operations are consumers, using telecommunications
bandwidth to move stock market and
commodity trading data internationally among offices, he said. But they
aren't actively trading bandwidth as they
do established commodities.

Major consumers of bandwidth would include large Internet service providers,
or ISPs. Gros said they should
also be included in the BTO.

Before bandwidth can be quickly and easily traded domestically, the market
needs a North American benchmark
that sets technical specifications, Gros said.

In domestic crude oil trading, the benchmark is West Texas Intermediate,
which must meet standards for
American Petroleum Institute specific gravity and for sulfur content.

In the bandwidth market, standards would be set for quality-of-service
issues like errored seconds, severely
errored seconds and unavailable seconds, Gros said. Those standards would
cover corruption of data
transmitted over bandwidth as well as the availability of bandwidth.

Enron has suggested that the benchmark cover the route between New York and
Los Angeles, which ranks
among the routes with the most data traffic in North America.

Agreeing on standards will be the toughest job to accomplish at the meeting,
said Ken Epps, senior vice
president for strategic marketing for Williams Communications Group (WCG),
which will also be represented at
the meeting.

The technical standards for bandwidth trading can't be set so high that they
limit the number of companies that
will trade, Epps said. If the standards limit liquidity, the market won't
develop.

"Everybody needs to walk away feeling that it's a standard they can live
with, that they can build their business
around," Epps said.

That goal can be met - it's just a question of how long it will take, he
said. "I don't expect it will be settled at the
first meeting of the CompTel group, but it will be the kickoff."

Williams plans to keep those discussion going next month at its own "carrier
forum" to discuss bandwidth trading
standards, Epps said.

About a year ago, when Enron first proposed trading bandwidth as a
commodity, Williams officials were quoted
as being skeptical about the idea.

But last month, the company announced it would take a leading role in
developing a market for trading
bandwidth. The Williams carrier meeting shows that the company is now
serious about bandwidth trading.

Williams is inviting "the real players, the MCI WorldComs (WCOM), the Qwests
(Q), the AT&Ts (T)," Epps
said. "It's about people who have the assets and how we use these to
advantage the marketplace, how we build
a good powerful market model."

CompTel's Frisby, Enron's Gros and Williams's Epps wouldn't discuss which
other companies were attending the
meeting in Washington. But Dow Jones Newswires was able to obtain a list of
attendees.

Among the invitees are companies with experience trading energy commodities
- Dynegy Inc. (DYN); El Paso
Energy Corp. (EPG); Columbia Transmission Communications, a unit of Columbia
Energy Group (CG); and
Koch Industries, which has investments in energy and telecommunications.

A surprise on the list is MCI WorldCom. Some industry sources have said the
company opposes the idea of
bandwidth trading under standard terms and conditions.

An industry analyst, who didn't want to be identified, said MCI WorldCom's
participation in the meeting is
indicative of changing attitudes in the telecom carrier industry about
bandwidth trading.

Retail marketing groups within telecommunications carrier companies don't
like the idea of a liquid bandwidth
trading market, the analyst said.

Such a market could turn retail customers into wholesale customers. For
example, a retail customer like an ISP
could go to a liquid bandwidth market and buy at wholesale prices, he said.

Also on the attendee list are telecom carriers Teleglobe (TGO) and Global
Crossing Ltd. (GBLX); NTT
America, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp.;
and Progress Telecom, a unit
of the electric utility Florida Progress Corp. (FPC).

Also on the list is recent IPO Universal Access Inc. (UAXS), a company that
matches carriers that have excess
capacity with carriers that need extra capacity.

LighTrade, a start-up company setting up pooling points to allow bandwidth
trading, was also invited.

Commodity traders are represented by Sakura Dellscher, Amerex, Prebon
Yamane, AIG Telecom and the New
York Mercantile Exchange.

Two consulting companies, Andersen Consulting and PricewaterhouseCoopers,
were also invited.