|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000
06:18 PM --------------------------- From: David Port 11/08/2000 05:14 PM To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Doorstep meeting Shona How odd ? I came away with the impression that: we would look at the outgoing commercial instructions to see whether they support the activity of the guys in Chicago with phones in their hands, and are in themselves wholly appropriate; we would address the issue of not having taped lines; we would address the issue of segregation of duties in the office, other than in Powerpoint we would get to the bottom of the difference between the AS400 and "Local Access Database" we would see a business model that defines how the office functions as an "origination only" office we would see a revised timeline for the resolution of the other issues in the review DP From: Shona Wilson 11/08/2000 04:37 PM To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Doorstep meeting ---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 04:41 PM --------------------------- Mike Jordan@ECT 11/07/2000 06:45 AM To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcelo Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Doorstep meeting Shona Thanks for the meeting yesterday - I think the process does improve the transparency and accountability of issues raised. After the call I mentioned to Ted that the meetings might be 'more efficient' if the specific issues identified during doorstep visits - that underpin report comments - were validated by the direct controller on 'point' for the office/business - in this case Marcelo. Ted replied that no harm came from the current approach and to a certain degree I agree that it is good to get an immediate collective response to issues raised !However, I thought we could discuss this for future meetings ( it could be part of the 'how to do a doorstep review' that my guys requested so they are ready to do their individual reviews next year ) -will call later Additionally, I thought I would confirm with you the actions I took down Marcelo and yourself to identify/communciate the specific control concerns identified that were not part of the core tasks transfered Marcelo to add these to existing process efficiencies ( such as systems improvements etc ) and give a full timeline for all 'doorstep' issues Tim to send details of outward bound Commercial instructions and to validate that no specfic exceptions have been recorded to date. Marcelo to validate that no existing business activities conflict systematically with the above instructions All to prepare for full NY review so as to validate compensating controls exist and function in NY Marcelo / Me to identify if any cultural issues are left from recent business communications on roles and responsibilities Myself to ensure that doorstep issues are included within database and monitoring process ( on timelines ) happens Will call later Mike
|