Enron Mail |
Meeting Attendees:Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynette Malone/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Wetterstroem/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Alix/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan S Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leei-Hong Chen/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy Wisemiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa Lehn/HOU/EES@EES Items discussed during the meeting & respective follow-up tasks. 1) DNS name for the project was selected, http://Entelligence.enron.com/ 2) Type of Users Identified the types of users and assigned names to each type. Users named are approvers for User Acceptance Testing (UAT). Originator Jennifer Frazer Trader/Financial Linda Clemmons Trader/Physical Jeff Shankman (will delegate to desk director) Sr Trading Manager Jeff Shankman Sr Operations Manager Sally Beck Administrator Mary Solmonson Originators will be the primary users (80-90% usage) Followup Item: Mary Solmonson will finalize the User names for UAT signoff. 3) Use Cases and Actors (user types) It was decided that capturing the requirements as Use cases will not be done with the GIA business users. Users stated that all types of users will have access to all reports. The functionality for each report will be same for all user types. Selection critieria and report content for each user type will be controlled by a security function. Use case may still be used by the Technology team, when required, to help engineer a better technical architecture. 4) User Signoff of requirements document for Phase I deliverables: Signoff for non-administrative functions: Jennifer Fraser Signoff for administrative functions: Mary Solmonson (addtl comments not discussed during yesterday's meeting) User change requests to requirements after signoff will be evaluated for impact to schedule and cost. Need signoff for Phase I deliverables before Phase I project schedule is finalized. 5) New user requirements reviewed: Find Like Prospects (required for Phase I) Peak Daily Volumes (required for Phase VII) Followup Item: Lynette Malone: Changes to requirements discussed in yesterday's meeting need to be applied to the Requirements document 6) Administrative Requirements Changes to administrative requirements are still outstanding. Users are meeting Friday, Feb 18 to discuss their requirements. Based on the outcome of that meeting, administrative deliverables for Phase I will have to be reviewed again and cost and schedule will have to be re-evaluated. Administrative requirements include GIA region administration, Data cleansing, Administration of products/internal companies/deal nature to identify deal activity captured in the Entelligence database. Followup Item: Mary Solmonson: Define changes to administrative requirements. 7) User Preferences Requirements for User preferences are not yet defined. User preferences will NOT be a Phase I deliverable. Mary Solmonson said User preferences will probably be deferred until Phase VII.
|