Enron Mail

From:bob.hall@enron.com
To:sally.beck@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com, jeffrey.gossett@enron.com,rita.wynne@enron.com
Subject:New Profit Centers
Cc:heather.choate@enron.com
Bcc:heather.choate@enron.com
Date:Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:40:00 -0800 (PST)

We may be creating another problem.

I'll have Heather set up a meeting for next week.

thanks

bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Bob M Hall/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 11:34=
AM ---------------------------
=20
=09Enron North America Corp. From: Rita Wynne @ ECT =
03/29/2001 11:05 AM=09
=09=09


To:=09Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:=09=20

Subject:=09New Profit Centers

Bob,=20

Per our conversation - on this past Tuesday, a group met from VM, Gas Acct=
g. and East Risk to discuss the recording of the 12 east desks and 7 centra=
l desks to SAP. Effective with March flow, each desks for Central and East =
will record to its own profit center in SAP (the wellhead desks and Texas w=
ere done in Feb.'s g/l). According to Gas Acct., they will calculate UA fo=
r each of the profit centers (19 in total). As we discussed, VM does not h=
ave the appropriate Unify reports or manpower to support this level of acc=
ounting at this time and for this month will continue to tie UA4 out as we =
have in the past using our same reports - Gas Acct. will have to sum their =
side of the UA4 calc. to match us. With the foresight of eventually going =
to profit center level accouting and reporting, there will need to be signi=
ficant changes to our current back end systems and processes to handle this=
lower level of reporting. I believe the flash is already being done at th=
e different profit centers, but all the downstream groups are still perform=
ing their analysis at a more consolidated level. There were discussions in=
the meeting that OA would not go to this lower level, but I am of the opin=
ion that we all need to be consistent in our analysis and reporting across =
the organization - so if this is the path we take, then everyone's process =
will need to be able to handle this level of detail. Of course, no decisio=
ns were made in our meeting, and as I stated, for now, VM's process will re=
main unchanged for this month. Please let me know if you want to discuss f=
urther. Thanks!