Enron Mail

From:shona.wilson@enron.com
To:cassandra.schultz@enron.com
Subject:Re: 12/5 Limit Violations and Notifications - Comments
Cc:michael.benien@enron.com, chris.abel@enron.com, daniel.falcone@enron.com,veronica.valdez@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com
Bcc:michael.benien@enron.com, chris.abel@enron.com, daniel.falcone@enron.com,veronica.valdez@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com
Date:Thu, 7 Dec 2000 01:42:00 -0800 (PST)

Dear Cassandra,

In looking at the comments below there are several errors made buy us, one in
the template itself, and some suggestions. At your request, we have started
to prepare this in addition to the normal word violation/notification memos
and our other work. As you have certain requests and requirements, it would
be helpful for someone in your group to review it before it went out to
ensure it meets your requirements.

Please let me know if this is workable and who the reviewer should be.

Thanks,

Shona




To: Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Veronica Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: 12/5 Limit Violations and Notifications - Comments

I realize this has already gone out, but I see a few errors that we should
correct - and actually, I think we should call Skilling and Lay's (and
Buy's) assistants (Veronica will handle this) and see if we can just hand
deliver to them a corrected version early this morning, e-mail is OK for Ted,
David and I. I have a few other suggestions on format/reporting changes as
well.


The NA Power VaR of $51MM was not 105% over its VaR limit of $50 - that would
have been $52.5 to require a report to Skilling, (but if we had had to report
it, don't use "WSCC", try to spell out or just don't use)
UK Gas's VaR limit is not $4, it's $7.5MM
I can't tie in UK Gas' QTD and YTD P/L - shouldn't it be what's on the DPR,
adjusted for the portion of the structured derivatives that is gas - call
over to that Yeo person and get the info. from them please
The 2nd item for NA Gas shouldn't be listed like that as it looks like
another violation - the comment re: the VaR increase was mean to go at the
bottom under RAC comments
The Finance Committe Chairman notification for Agg. VaR is not 100%, it's
115% (notification requirement box)
EES had a VaR violation - $7.5 vs. 7 - that is a Skilling level violation
Let's have the "Re:" say "Limit Violations and Notifications for December 5,
2000"
Let's number them all sequentially rather than starting over at each level


Veronica will call you to coordinate re-distribution.

Going forward, we need to increase our level of review for these as they're
getting a lot of scrutiny given market dynamics and our increasing risk.

Thank you,
Cassandra.

---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000
07:38 AM ---------------------------


Michael Benien
12/06/2000 07:08 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: 12/5 Limit Violations and Notifications