Enron Mail

From:ted.murphy@enron.com
To:bjorn.hagelmann@enron.com
Subject:Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power
Cc:shona.wilson@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com, cassandra.schultz@enron.com
Bcc:shona.wilson@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com, cassandra.schultz@enron.com
Date:Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:23:00 -0800 (PST)

I had this discussion with Scott and Beth several months ago - in the
Doorstep - "enpower" is a metaphor for a risk management system that isn't an
abomination (which was the current state at the time). Have they made
improvements to said abomination that are acceptable for the current level of
business. Enpower seems to be acceptable to all. Clearly, my appetite for
supporting more risk on an inferior platform is close to zero. More
importantly in the global competition for capital of all kind, the standard
is not controlled spreadsheets, i.e., last time I spoke to Peter Lynch, Jim
Rogers, and Archie McCallister, they were on more sophisticated platforms
with infinitely more functionality.
Peace an Love
Ted





From: Bjorn Hagelmann
11/16/2000 05:24 PM





To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Since this was a fix to a Doorstep finding, how do we react?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT on 16/11/2000
17:25 ---------------------------



From: Scott Mills 14/11/2000 13:46


To: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Julie Ramos/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Feldman/SA/Enron@Enron, Xochitl
Figueroa/NA/Enron@Enron, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Lavarato has stopped efforts for implementing Enpower in South America until
business activity increases enough to support it.

Based on below, we will start looking for someone with strong Access/Excel
knowledge to come up with a different solution. Everyone will have to
regroup and determine next steps and look at revised timelines.

SRM (x33548)
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Mills/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------


Enron Technology

From: Steve Nat @ ENRON 11/14/2000 01:31 PM


To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

FYI...

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 01:12
PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT 11/14/2000 11:53 AM

To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

I discussed this with John Lavorato who is now responsible for this. He said
don't do anything! When their volumes increase we can address the Enpower
implementation again.

Beth





Richard Burchfield
11/08/2000 08:17 AM

To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Steve,
Come by my office to discuss.

Richard




Enron Technology

From: Steve Nat @ ENRON 11/08/2000 08:07 AM


To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Richard / Beth, We have been asked by risk to get Argentina started on
EnPower. Are you OK with us moving on this? A couple things to consider...

Our instance strategy for EnPower is determined by geographic location
(bandwidth), volumes, and market similarity (functionality). Based on this,
I want to set South America up on their own instance. EnPower will have the
following instances long term: EUR, US, CND, SA, AUS, JPN, IND. We will
continue to pursue a common code base and logical data model.

There is additional time and cost associated with setting up a new instance,
however, I am concerned about continuing to pile new business units into a
production environment that will eventually need to be split.

Glad to discuss... Please respond quickly, as we are waiting to pull the
trigger on this...

Steve


---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 07:32
AM ---------------------------
From: Duong Luu@ECT on 11/07/2000 01:06 PM
To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

fyi

----- Forwarded by Duong Luu/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 01:05 PM -----

Trang Le
11/07/2000 12:53 PM

To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Duong,
Per our phone conversation, below is the list of people that would need
access to EnPower production.

User Names: NT ID: Extension:
Scott Mills SMills x3-3548
Martha Stevens MSteven x3-4742
Sarah Smith SSmith x3-0997
Juana Fayette JFayett x3-0992
Jana Morse JMorse x6-8265
Trang Le TLe1 x3-6996

Currently, the Argentine Power group has in total about 20 physical forward
deals which will be done under Enron Comercializadora De Energia Argentina
S.A.(Co. 027W) and one financial deal which will be done under Enron North
America (Co. 0364). Given the fact that we'll also have deals on ENA, I would
think that we could be on the Houston server. Just let us know.
In the mean time, we'll be working with the various Global groups to have the
proper desk, portfolio, facilities etc.... set up.

Thanks for your help,
Trang x3-6996