Enron Mail

From:sally.beck@enron.com
To:david.oxley@enron.com
Subject:FW: Input Needed
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:15:55 -0700 (PDT)

Another opinion. I read Barry's response from EBS. Not a lot of overwhelming sentiment for Professional Services. Since this in only a term used in the PRC process, I don't know that a name change at this point would make much of a difference. Let me know is decided. --Sally

-----Original Message-----
From: Hedstrom, Peggy
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Beck, Sally
Subject: Re: Input Needed

We would also like to see a change from Commercial Support, however, we are not that keen on Professional Services. Some other alternatives might be:

Commercial Services
Network Services

Let us know where it ends up.




From: Sally Beck/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/04/2001 09:31 AM CDT
To: Bob M Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Beth Apollo/ENRON@enronXgate, Brent A Price/ENRON@enronXgate, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Input Needed

What do you think? I have never been crazy about the Commercial Support tag myself. Do you like professional services? Or do you have another suggestion. Please send me your comments within the next day or so. I would like to get back to David Oxley soon. Thanks. --Sally

-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Beck, Sally; Colwell, Wes
Cc: Kean, Steven; Olson, Cindy; Lynch, Drew; Pieper, Kalen; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Barnard, Marla; Joyce, Mary; Smith, Gary; Corteselli, Gina
Subject: Proposal to Change "Commercial Support" peer group label to "Professional Services"

At the VP PRC meeting last Wednesday, Dave Delainey proposed we consider retitling the Commercial Support peer group as above. Apparently this suggestion was made and broadly supported at a policy committee meeting a few weeks ago. The suggestion is that the Support label is seen rather negatively across the organisation and the new label may be an improvement.

The VP PRC Committee resolved that they would be open to supporting a change, subject to the senior leads from across CS providing their views/support.

I volunteered to circulate this note to the 2 of you in EWS and ask my colleagues from HR to share with their CS leads to solicit their views before returning to the committee late next week with summarised reaction. Perhaps you would provide me with your views and a vote for or against?

I would strongly recommend that we do broadly discuss this outside a small circle of people.

David