|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Sebesta, Chris </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSEBEST2< X-To: Zadow, Raetta </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rzadow<, Blair, Lynn </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lblair<, Washington, Kathy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kwashin<, Fancler, Dan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dfancle< X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \LBLAIR (Non-Privileged)\Blair, Lynn\Acctg - Customer Issues on Billing X-Origin: Blair-L X-FileName: LBLAIR (Non-Privileged).pst No, Alliant only agreed to pay for the commodity and cashout imbalance invoices for the previous 6 months (which they did). They sent Northern a letter stating they disputed our collection beyond the 6 month GISB window. I had worked with Kathy Washington and Dan Fancler to make sure the $932,585 would be placed in suspense versus showing up as a receivable on our books. I am still working with Dari and Shelly on a letter to be sent to Alliant which addresses the GISB standards and the fact Northern believes they are responsible for the invoices. -----Original Message----- From: Zadow, Raetta Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:13 PM To: Blair, Lynn; Washington, Kathy; Fancler, Dan; Sebesta, Chris Cc: Zadow, Raetta Subject: Alliant Energy - IES Utilities dispute re: Poi 2870 - Cherokee #1 TBS - July 99 thru April 2001 Lynn, regarding the letters that you asked me to look over, I thought that they had agreed to pay these invoices. We currently have on IES's accounts receivable an amount of $932,585.91 which represents $25,342.30 for commodity invoices and $907,243.61 for imbalance invoices. We have already waived the DDVC invoices of $23,697.36. If you have any further questions, just let me know. Thanks, Raetta
|