Enron Mail

From:dari.dornan@enron.com
To:lynn.blair@enron.com, kenneth.cessac@enron.com, gregory.porter@enron.com,kay.miller@enron.com, dave.neubauer@enron.com, britt.davis@enron.com, kathy.ringblom@enron.com, steve.january@enron.com, harry.woodson@enron.com, rick.dietz@enron.com, charlie.
Subject:RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 27 Dec 2001 08:47:48 -0800 (PST)

Charlie sent me the following message.
"If the intent is to calculate the average between the two sets of numbers (NNG's vs ONEOK's) the "settlement number" would be 567,546.5!"
As the settlement document states that the blank number is what we are going to use for "PTR", I think Charlie is correct. His number takes the average between the Plant PTR calculation and Northern's number.

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Lynn
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Dornan, Dari; Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Cc: Blair, Lynn
Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement

Dari, Harry and I have run through the numbers and how we will show the difference on the
books and agree with your number. Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Dornan, Dari
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:14 AM
To: Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement

So the settlement number will be 8,624.50 MMBtu.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cessac, Kenneth
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Dornan, Dari; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement

Dari,

Listed below are the volumes from plant PTR and NNG calculated PTR based on inlet/outlet measurement for September 12 - 17. The Plant PTR values were obtained from a letter from ONEOK to Harry Woodson dated November 1, 2001. This information may help in determining the settlement volume for this time period.


Date Plant PTR NNG PTR Difference
9/12/2001 88,335 90,910 2,575
9/13/2001 92,175 95,968 3,793
9/14/2001 93,525 96,151 2,626
9/15/2001 95,422 98,994 3,572
9/16/2001 96,881 98,783 1,902
9/17/2001 92,584 95,365 2,781
TOTAL 17,249
-----Original Message-----
From: Dornan, Dari
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:35 PM
To: Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Cessac, Kenneth; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Subject: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement

Attached please find a draft settlement agreement for the September 12 - 17 dispute. Please let me have your comments ASAP. We need to fax this on Friday. Dari

<< File: Oneok Settlement re incident of September 12 - 17.doc <<