![]() |
Enron Mail |
Just to follow up, did you send a letter to Van Ryn at Koch re the
hydrocarbon and mercury contaminations? If so, could you please send me a copy? Also, have you been able to come up with any further info on what to do about the other soil contamination areas? Do you still want to determine the full lateral and vertical extent of all? FYI, I have made further inquiry as to whether we have any reporting or investigatory duties based upon the levels in the WZI report. I believe the numbers you cited in you 5/21 email may be only part of the story: as you have appropriately noted, in California it is not only concentration levels that matter; rather, other variables such as depth to groundwater, proximity to population centers, etc. determine whether any reporting or remedial (including further investigatory) obligations arise. Therefore, I'm checking further to see how these other variable impact our legal obligations here. (Again, I think this is very important inour case because we want to be careful about potenially jeopardizing our indemnity rights against Koch by performing any Phase II-type activities where not legally required. I expect to have more info on this by the end of the week. Perhaps we can chat then? Thanks. --ETA
|