Enron Mail

From:edward.attanasio@enron.com
To:larry.campbell@enron.com
Subject:NCL -- Soil Contamination Issues
Cc:molly.sample@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com, scott.jones@enron.com,bob.jacobs@enron.com
Bcc:molly.sample@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com, scott.jones@enron.com,bob.jacobs@enron.com
Date:Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT)

Just to follow up, did you send a letter to Van Ryn at Koch re the
hydrocarbon and mercury contaminations? If so, could you please send me a
copy?

Also, have you been able to come up with any further info on what to do
about the other soil contamination areas? Do you still want to determine the
full lateral and vertical extent of all? FYI, I have made further inquiry as
to whether we have any reporting or investigatory duties based upon the
levels in the WZI report. I believe the numbers you cited in you 5/21 email
may be only part of the story: as you have appropriately noted, in California
it is not only concentration levels that matter; rather, other variables such
as depth to groundwater, proximity to population centers, etc. determine
whether any reporting or remedial (including further investigatory)
obligations arise. Therefore, I'm checking further to see how these other
variable impact our legal obligations here. (Again, I think this is very
important inour case because we want to be careful about potenially
jeopardizing our indemnity rights against Koch by performing any Phase
II-type activities where not legally required.

I expect to have more info on this by the end of the week. Perhaps we can
chat then? Thanks. --ETA