![]() |
Enron Mail |
Were able to convince the air board yesterday that the testing done to the #4
heater should be thrown out due to procedures not followed. The other company did not do the sampling at the correct elevation in the stack,as well as problems found with the calibrations of his equipment. The air board agreed to disregard all testing done by the first company. We completed the testing on the #4 heater late yesterday, using Aeros, and passed without a problem. We were going to also test the #2 heater yesterday, but the air board requested we wait until next week as we were getting a late start. There were not going to be any additional fines for the delayed testing due to it was at the air board's request. I will let you know how next week goes. Thanks again for the help. Larry Campbell@ENRON 01/12/01 10:52 AM To: Rick Suderman/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott cc: Edward Attanasio/Remote/Eott@Eott, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron, Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: Testing REsults Rick, how did the AEROS emissions testing go with the heater?
|