|
|
Enron Mail |
Thank you. We look forward to a productive session on Tuesday. Have a great
holiday weekend. -----Original Message----- From: "Myers, Richard A." <ram@cpuc.ca.gov<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Myers+2C+20Richard+20A+2E+22+20+3Cram+40cpuc+2Eca+2Egov+ 3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:42 PM To: Fawcett, Jeffery Subject: RE: CPUC Workshop on 4/17 Mr. Fawcett, Having your copies of your presentation available would be very helpful and appreciated. I am expecting about 80 people to attend the workshop. I'll put Transwestern as the first name on the "standby" list. Richard Myers -----Original Message----- From: Fawcett, Jeffery [mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com << File: mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com << ] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 1:12 PM To: ram@cpuc.ca.gov Cc: Scott, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; mbaldwin@igservice.com Subject: CPUC Workshop on 4/17 Mr. Meyers, I certainly understand and, unfortunately, I suspected as much. I'm sure there are quite a few parties with keen interest in this investigation. Because of flight schedules, the Transwestern contingent may not be able to stay until 4:30 p.m., so I'm not sure I could even commit to a presentation at the end of the day. We'd certainly be happy to be squeezed in during the day if another party's presentation was shorter than expected. In any event, I was wondering if I might leave behind a copy of TW's presentation for others to take home? Like I said, its chief purpose is to introduce (or for most folks, reacquaint) Transwestern to the stakeholders in this investigation, and to provide specific information regarding it's capability to deliver gas to California. Would it be possible to at least acknowledge during the day that our handouts are available to the attendees? We could either pass them out or have them on a table at the back. I'll wait to hear your guidance on the best way to do this. As I said before, Transwestern is committed to working with the CPUC to fully develop the record and to cooperatively address any and all issues identified in this investigation. If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know. Thank you. < -----Original Message----- < From: "Myers, Richard A." <ram@cpuc.ca.gov<@ENRON < [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Myers+2C+20Richard+20A+2E+22+20+3Cram+40cpuc+2Ec << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Myers+2C+20Richard+20A+2E+22+20+3Cram+40cpuc+2Ec << < a+2Egov+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] < Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 11:02 AM < To: Fawcett, Jeffery < Subject: RE: CPUC Workshop on 4/17 < < < Mr. Fawcett, < Thanks very much for your offer, but at this point I can't guarantee < that you would be able to make a presentation. Virtually all the time < has been now taken up by other presentations. There is an outside < chance that you could make a 10 minute presentation, either at the < very end of the day, or possibly squeezed in at some point during the < day if other presentations end more quickly than expected. But I can't < assure you that this will be possible. < Richard Myers < -----Original Message----- < From: Fawcett, Jeffery [mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com << File: mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com << << File: < mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com << File: mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com << << ] < Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:47 AM < To: ram@cpuc.ca.gov < Cc: Scott, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; mbaldwin@igservice.com < Subject: CPUC Workshop on 4/17 < Mr. Myers, < My name is Jeff Fawcett. I am a commercial representative of < Transwestern Pipeline Co. and was its witness during the recent GIR < proceedings. Given Transwestern's role as one of the principal < suppliers of natural gas to the State of California, we are very < interested in the outcome of these proceedings and offer our < assistance < to the Commission in its investigation. < Much has been discussed in the press recently about pipeline < infrastructure in California, as well as the upstream capacity of FERC < < pipes that serve the California marketplace. I know there is much to < be < covered in the 4/17 workshop. However, if the schedule permits, < Transwestern would like to offer a brief overview of its delivery < system < to California and its view of the key issues the Commission and < stakeholders face as the investigation moves forward. TW's < presentation < should take no more than 10-15 minutes. < Please let me know if the Energy Division would like TW to make such a < < presentation and, if possible, approximately what point during the 9 < -4:30 session Transwestern will be invited to step forward. I'm < available by return email or you may reach me by telephone at < 713-853-1521. Thank you. <
|