RE: FW: Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v.

Cc: leslie.lawner@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: leslie.lawner@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
X-From: Rebecca W Cantrell
X-To: Barry Tycholiz, Colleen Sullivan, Donna Greif, Ed McMichael, Jane M Tholt, Jeff Dasovich, Jess Hewitt, Patti Sullivan, Paul Kaufman, Phillip K Allen, Randall L Gay, Robert Superty, Roger O Ponce, Stephanie Miller, Susan J Mara, Suzanne Calcagno, Tori Kuykendall
X-cc: Leslie Lawner, James D Steffes
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
02:38 PM ---------------------------
From: Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 10:16 AM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. El
Paso Natural Gas Company, et al., Docket No. RP00-241-000

Yes,

It had by shipper, by contract level info. -- the type of info available on
our transactional reports. There is a protective order in place in the
proceeding, so I don't believe the information is generally available. We
did not ask for confidential treatment -- but we did excise rate information
for periods prior to Sept. 2000 (the date that this info started appearing on
our transactional reports).

-----Original Message-----
From: Cantrell, Rebecca
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Cc: Lawner, Leslie
Subject: Re: FW: Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. El
Paso Natural Gas Company, et al., Docket No. RP00-241-000

Shelley, how detailed was the information provided? Was it broken down by
shipper? Also, did you request confidential treatment?

From: Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 09:32 AM
To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. El
Paso Natural Gas Company, et al., Docket No. RP00-241-000

FYI

Judge Wagner issued a subpoena to Transwestern and several other pipelines in
the referenced proceeding at SoCal Edison's request. The request sought
information on scheduled, actual and contracts quantities to the California
border for the time period 1997 to present. While we are not a party in the
case, we decided to cooperate in the proceeding and not file a motion to
quash. We responded yesterday.