Enron Mail

From:w..cantrell@enron.com
To:k..allen@enron.com, don.black@enron.com, suzanne.calcagno@enron.com,mark.courtney@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, frank.ermis@enron.com, donna.fulton@enron.com, l..gay@enron.com, mike.grigsby@enron.com, jess.hewitt@enron.com, keith.holst@enron.com
Subject:FW: CPUC v. El Paso
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 6 Aug 2001 13:32:34 -0700 (PDT)

This is probably not a good thing for marketing affiliates in general!! =20

We can't figure out what El Paso's strategy is here, but surely they have o=
ne. Either that, or they were afraid to put their guys back on the stand o=
n the affiliate abuse issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Fulton, Donna =20
Sent:=09Monday, August 06, 2001 2:53 PM
To:=09Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Lawner, Leslie; Steffes, James D.
Cc:=09Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Dasovich, Jeff; Yoho, Lisa; Thom=
e, Jennifer
Subject:=09CPUC v. El Paso

The California affiliate abuse case of El Paso ended today when El Paso ref=
used to bring CEO William Wise, and Chairman of the pipeline, John Somerhal=
der to testify before the ALJ. The Judge had warned El Paso on Friday that=
it must defend itself against the accusations set forth by the CPUC. Inst=
ead, El Paso made a motion for summary judgement to the Judge. After a ver=
y short recess, the Judge came back and denied the motion finding that the =
CPUC had made its prima facia case and El Paso had failed to provide the fu=
ll record to defend itself. Much of the evidence in the case was reviewed =
by the Judge in camera and put into the record in a redacted format. The =
Judge's Initial Decision is due October 9, 2001. The Judge made further co=
mments that this was clearly a case of a pipeline and merchant affiliate de=
aling both sides of a deal. The Judge indicated that information about all=
aspects of the pipeline and merchant businesses was sent to Wise in memora=
nda with minute detail with cc:s to Somerhalder.