Enron Mail

From:vicki.sharp@enron.com
To:jeff.dasovich@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com,kelly.higgason@enron.com
Subject:Re: California Update--09.13.01--3:15 PM
Cc:j..kean@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,jeremy.blachman@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, kristin.walsh@enron.com, david.delainey@enron.com, dan.leff@enron.com, lamar.frazier@enron.com, kevin.ke
Bcc:j..kean@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,jeremy.blachman@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, kristin.walsh@enron.com, david.delainey@enron.com, dan.leff@enron.com, lamar.frazier@enron.com, kevin.ke
Date:Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:45:18 -0700 (PDT)

please add mike d smith and kelly higgason to your distribution list.


From:=09Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/13/2001 05:19 PM
To:=09Steven J Kean/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim=
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@=
EES, Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Krist=
in Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@E=
ES, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Keeney/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HO=
U/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Swa=
in/ENRON@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Kaufman/ENRON@e=
nronXgate, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enr=
onXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Don Black/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Ri=
chter/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet Dietrich/HOU=
/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Robertson/ENRON@enronXgate, =
Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Palmer=
/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Wanda Curry/ENRON@enro=
nXgate, Lisa Mellencamp/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:=09=20
Subject:=09California Update--09.13.01--3:15 PM

?=09DWR filed comments with the California PUC today urging the Commission =
to adopt a July 1 suspension date.
?=09In addition, DWR takes the position that, if the Commission does not en=
act a July 1 retroactive suspension date, the Commission should require tha=
t all customers who went DA after July 1 pay a proportionate share of the b=
onds and DWR going-forward contracts.
?=09Customers and providers will strongly oppose DWR's proposal at the PUC.

Best,
Jeff