|
|
Enron Mail |
FYI. The case management statements are due May 5. I'll forward Rule 49
separately so that you can start thinking about what we need to say in it. Also think about who we are aligned with for purposes of cross-examination panels. -----Original Message----- From: Cooke, Michelle [mailto:mlc@cpuc.ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 12:27 PM To: 'smckinley@ingaa.org'; 'jwilliams@eei.org'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil' <mailto:'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'< ; 'rcsstl@cdmnet.com'; 'mbrubaker@consultbai.com' <mailto:'mbrubaker@consultbai.com'< ; 'tdodd@lgl.twc.com'; 'michael-briggs@reliantenergy.com'; 'andy.bettwy@swgas.com'; 'dnorris@sppc.com'; 'fchu@legal.ladwp.com'; 'napedersen@jonesday.com'; 'athomas@newenergy.com'; 'lisa_g_urick@calpx.com'; 'kduggan@capstoneturbine.com'; 'montoym1@sce.com'; 'rsperberg@onsitesycom.com'; 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'mshames@ucan.org'; 'snelson@sempra.com'; 'gbutsko@butskoutility.com'; 'solardevelopmentcooperative@go.com' <mailto:'solardevelopmentcooperative@go.com'< ; 'lmoses@anaheim.net'; 'awattslaw@earthlink.net' <mailto:'awattslaw@earthlink.net'< ; 'rjhickok@duke-energy.com'; 'gackerman@wptf.org'; 'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'; 'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'; Bromson, Jonathan; 'difellman@energy-law-group.com'; 'theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us'; 'chrisw@greenlining.org'; 'dgrueneich@gralegal.com'; 'jlondon@gralegal.com'; 'peter.bray@pgees.com'; 'ewo@jmbm.com'; 'saw@jmbm.com' <mailto:'saw@jmbm.com'< ; 'abh1@pge.com'; 'jff1@pge.com'; 'phanschen@mofo.com'; 'pxo2@pge.com'; 'scarter@nrdc.org'; 'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'; 'bcragg@gmssr.com'; 'bgaillard@enron.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com'; 'jsqueri@gmssr.com'; 'jkarp@whitecase.com'; 'lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com'; 'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'; 'ssmyers@hooked.net'; 'grant_kolling@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us'; 'uditetrad@slip.net'; 'jackp@calpine.com'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com'; 'dmarcus@slip.net'; 'gmorris@emf.net'; 'philm@scdenergy.com'; 'mpretto@ci.santa-clara.ca.us'; 'bmcc@mccarthylaw.com'; 'scottst@mid.org' <mailto:'scottst@mid.org'< ; 'jeff@jbsenergy.com'; 'blaising@braunlegal.com'; 'jsole@caiso.com'; 'jweil@aglet.org'; 'nextel3@msn.com'; 'bdicapo@lmlaw.net'; 'jdh@eslawfirm.com'; 'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'rliebert@cfbf.com'; 'aorchar@smud.org'; 'mpa@aelaw.com'; 'jna@olywa.net'; 'dws@keywaycorp.com'; 'camthor@statoilenergy.com'; 'achan@ladwp.com'; 'jkloberdanz@sempra.com' <mailto:'jkloberdanz@sempra.com'< ; 'ronknecht@aol.com'; 'lhubbard@sempra.com'; 'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; 'oshirock@pacbell.net'; 'stephanie.krapf@pactel.com'; 'epoole@adplaw.com'; 'aod@newsdata.com'; 'resource@sirius.com'; 'dya@ux.netcom.com'; 'bepstein@fablaw.com'; 'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'rczahar@aol.com'; 'rothrock@ix.netcom.com'; 'rmccann@cal.net'; 'jewilson@arb.ca.gov'; 'karen@klindh.com'; 'brussel@ci.redding.ca.us'; Ortega, Barbara; Johnson, Aaron J.; Mazy, Anthony; Wetstone, Brad; Danforth, Christopher; Berman, Daniel M.; Smith, Don; Quiroz, Edgar A.; Quan, Edwin; Cluff, George; Wilson, Gregory A.; Loewen, James; Morse, Jay; Tran, Lana; Tan, Lee-Whei; Enderby, Marshal B.; Lyons, Martin G.; Ebke, Maryam; Cooke, Michelle; Walsh, Natalie; White, Rosalina; Cauchois, Scott; 'toe@cpuc.ca.gov'; Beck, Valerie; Blumer, Werner M.; Gibson, William; Johnston, William; Tapawan-Conway, Zenaida G.; 'jogata@energy.state.ca.us'; 'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us'; 'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us' <mailto:'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us'< ; 'vschwent@energy.state.ca.us'; 'jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov'; 'jgrau@energy.state.ca.us'; 'jgopal@energy.state.ca.us' Subject: Upcoming Scheduling PHC in R.99-10-025 Good afternoon everyone- I wanted to let you all know a bit more about what I hope to accomplish at the 5/10 PHC for the DG proceeding. It is my hope that we will leave the PHC with a planned witness order for the hearings. Therefore, parties should come prepared to discuss witness availability and cross estimates by witness. In fact, if you can provide estimates to me informally prior to the PHC, I would greatly appreciate it. Any work that the parties can do ahead of time to reduce to scope of issues that require cross is appreciated. In the scoping ruling, Commissioner Bilas directed that a case management statement be submitted consistent with Rule 49. We are looking forward to seeing that. In addition, I'd like you all to consider offering panels of witnesses for cross in the event that you have significant alignment of positions with other parties. This should reduce the time required as well. We will not tolerate repetitive cross or friendly cross, therefore, the parties with aligned positions should also consider designating a representative to cross witnesses in order to reduce hearing time. (If witnesses have corrections to their direct or rebuttal testimony, these should be submitted in writing as an errata exhibit, whenever possible, in order to reduce additional direct on the stand.) During the hearings we will run 9-1 Tuesday-Friday, Mondays we will run 10-4. This gives us approximately 28 hours of cross time. If parties estimates exceed this amount of time, the Commissioner and I will allocate time accordingly. In addition, at the PHC I intend to identify the direct and rebuttal testimony with exhibit numbers so that we do not need to spend time doing that at the hearing. We will also set a date by which any motions to strike testimony are due. I hope this information is helpful. See you in a couple of weeks! Michelle Cooke Administrative Law Judge mlc@cpuc.ca.gov 415 703 2637
|