|
|
Enron Mail |
OK, i'm trying this again. Jim, please let me know if you receive this. I'm
attaching the previous notes. ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 01/27/2000 06:41 PM --------------------------- Tom Gros@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS 01/19/2000 08:59 AM To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES@ECT@ENRON cc: jtobin@mofo.com@EES@ECT@ENRON, Thomas D Gros@ECT@ENRON Subject: Re: The California ISO Desire to Lay off Some OC-48 Capacity John Yurkanin (CA ISO) is my former boss at BP Gas. I'd be happy to talk with them about excess capacity. Jeff Dasovich@EES 01/17/00 01:01 PM To: jtobin@mofo.com, Thomas D Gros@ECT cc: Subject: The California ISO Desire to Lay off Some OC-48 Capacity Hi Jim: As we discussed, your client, the California Independent System Operator, contracted with MCI to build a high-speed, broad band network (predominately OC-48?)as the platform to launch electricity deregulation in California. Since that time, the ISO has discovered that it has capacity substantially in excess of what it needs to operate the grid (and certain markets for power, e.g., ancillary services). Rather than try to re-negotiate the contract with MCI, the ISO is now looking at marketing the capacity. Sounds like the capacity runs between Sacramento (Folsom?) and Southern California (Alhambra?). Please correct any (unintended) inaccuracies I may have included in this very brief description. Tom Gros is VP of Enron's global bandwidth trading group and can help determine the value/feasibility of having the ISO make use of Enron's bandwith trading platform. Tom, meet Jim. Jim, meet Tom Best, Jeff
|