|
|
Enron Mail |
Hey! Everyone seems to miss a point I tried to make clear. The collaboration
I suggested is not with Haas. Don't mention that name! The collaboration is with IBER and UEI, two research organizations that are not formally connected with any school. Shapiro suggested that they could offer some modest help with resources, and we have to figure out if it's worth asking for any. Maybe if we are planning to keep the "conference fees" for GSPP then it is better not to ask them for any money (and thus keep clear our claim to any fees). Reactions? Monday is Labor Day by the way. Cheers, Lee -----Original Message----- From: gramlr@pjm.com [mailto:gramlr@pjm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 3:44 AM To: whederman@columbiaenergygroup.com; doornbos@socrates.berkeley.edu; amosher@appanet.org; hcameron@uclink.berkeley.edu; lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu; jeff.dasovich@enron.com Subject: Draft program Shall we try to talk again Monday? I think I will talk to Borenstein to see what the Haas folks have in mind. I tried to capture everyone's comments. Allen, you might want to explain more about your panel suggestions since I didn't do them justice. As you'll see I took the liberty of offering a new characterization of the panels that I didn't bring up on the call. Everything on there is offered as a strawman to be criticized and changed. Rob <<Draft program.doc<< Rob Gramlich PJM Market Monitoring Unit (610) 666-4291 gramlr@pjm.com
|