|
|
Enron Mail |
We need to get CRA or CMTA to sign on -- because they were in the earlier Preferred Policy decision plus they filed for rehearing in this case as well. This can be circulated. I'll send it to the Metals people.
-----Original Message----- From: Ed Duncan [mailto:EDuncan2@ArterHadden.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:12 PM To: Mara, Susan Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com Subject: Supreme Court Petition Sue, Attached is a draft of the Petition which can be circulated. I recommend that an Alliance member join the Alliance as a Petitioner to eliminate any issue about standing. I am assuming that there is at least one willing member who was also a formal party to the proceeding which resulted in the Preferred Policy Decision. Was the Alliance a formal party to that proceeding? The basic structure of the Petition is complete. I shall complile the Exhibits and then review same to determine whether the citations and to add any arguments which have been overlooked. I would like to file on November 9. I think that this Petition and the Commonwealth Petition should be filed on the same day. If you concur, I will coordinate with Commonwealth's counsel. I look forward to your comments. EWD
|