|
|
Enron Mail |
FYI
-----Original Message----- From: "Fantz, Donald" <DIF1@pge.com<@ENRON@EES Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 2:34 PM To: Cone, Rob Cc: vanUlden, Dirk; Crevelt, Richard; "Kinert, Robert" <RCK3@pge.com<; "Hagen, John H" <JHH4@pge.com<; "'Dick Smith@FSU'" <dicks@csufresno.edu< Subject: RE: PG&E Detailed Study - CSUF Rob, Thank you for the opportunity to clarify. There is no rule for fifteen days per se. Based on the date we delivered the final study to CSUF/Enron (Jan. 12, 2000), we would need an answer back in 15 days in order to have a reasonable chance at making your stated schedule (as shared with us on 11/15/99 and re-stated on 1/5/00) for getting the new substation on line. You actually have 60 days to respond. In the Detailed Study, we requested a written notice to proceed by February 1, 2000 to make CSUF/Enron's target completion date for the new substation online. CSUF/Enron can take up to 60 days, but doing so will impact the desired schedule and necessitate a scheduling change. Don Fantz PG&E < ---------- < From: Cone, Rob[SMTP:Rob_Cone@enron.com] < Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 4:16 PM < To: Fantz, Donald < Cc: vanUlden, Dirk; Crevelt, Richard < Subject: PG&E Detailed Study - CSUF < < Don < < Can you indicate the PG&E rule that requires a response to a Detailed < Study within a fifteen day window after receipt of the Study? < < Rob Cone < < Project Manager < Enron Energy Services < 12647 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 500 < San Ramon, CA 94583 < Ph:925.543.3701, Fax:925.543.3550 < Pager:888.397.5826 < <
|