|
|
Enron Mail |
I remain a supporter of this joint effort but a victim of impossible schedule
conflicts, so I'm enlarging briefly on my last note in response to the latest draft. In principle, NRDC can support rate stabilization proposals that include a stable commodity charge, but we (and others) will have huge problems with proposals that are structured as a frozen bundled rate that includes distribution costs. When you do the latter, you tie distribution revenue recovery directly to throughput over the wires, ensuring that both energy efficiency and on-site distributed resources will reduce distribution-revenue recovery (and that a lack of both will have the opposite effect). While I know not all on this list share our objective of breaking this "throughput addiction" for distribution companies, there is no reason to prejudge the issue in the proposal from this group.
|