RE: Counterproposal to PG&E September 24, 1999, OFO Settlement Offer

Thank you for the summary. ORA's proposed language under the cost
recovery section:

Cost Recovery
- Revise Section B.3 (now B.4) to eliminate the last sentence and
add the following "While PG&E may seek recovery of these costs, other
parties to this settlement do not necessarily support PG&E's right to
recover any additional costs."

-----Original Message-----
From: Yoo, Salle [mailto:salleyoo@dwt.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 11:23 AM
To: Andy Skaff; Ben Ledene; Bob Shively; Catherine Sullivan; Craig
Chancellor; Ed Yates; Edward O'Neill; Gerald Worster; Grant Kolling;
Greg Bloom; Gregory Klatt; James Weil; Jamie Ramierez; Jay Cattermole;
Jeff Dasovich; Joe Paul; John Leslie; Katie Elder; Keith McCrea; Lindsey
How-Downing; Marcel Hawiger; Mark Baldwin; Mark Pocta; Matt Brady;
Michael Rochman; Norm Pedersen; Paul Amirault; Raveen Maan; Rich Hall;
Ron Oechsler; Tom Solberg
Subject: Counterproposal to PG&E September 24, 1999, OFO Settlement
Offer

The enclosed document is a summary of changes to PG&E's September 24, 1999
OFO settlement offer, as proposed by parties during the telephone conference
last Friday (October 1, 1999). We intend to offer this counterproposal to
PG&E at the October 5th settlement conference.

<<Counterproposal to PG1_.doc<<

- att1.htm