|
|
Enron Mail |
At least one change was made on the mark-up that wasn't flagged in the
Summary. In C.1.e; maintain records of the 'Core Procurement's' storage activity, was changed to maintaining records for 'all storage accounts'. Is this because PG&E would consider Core Procurement to be just another storage account? If so, the original intent is still accomplished. However, although the Parties obviously thought there might at some point be value in examining the historical info on the core's use of storage, I don't think any of us would feel we ever would have any business examining data on a third party's use of their negotiated storage account. Paul Amirault VP Bus. Dvlpt., Wild Goose Storage Inc., and Manager, Marketing PaulAmirault@aec.ca AEC Storage & Hub Services (403) 266-8298 -----Original Message----- From: Thomas, Dan (CGT Mgr) [mailto:DFT1@pge.com] Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 1:04 PM DEAR OII AND OFO SETTLEMENT PARTIES: Thank you to the parties who worked very hard to develop the September 15, 1999 OFO Settlement Proposal in response to PG&E's August 18 proposal. We have carefully reviewed your settlement offer and sought clarification where needed. As a result, PG&E is able to accept most of the changes and provisions contained in that proposal, and is offering back a few modifications which we think should allow us to reach closure on a multi-party OFO Settlement Agreement. We encourage all parties to sign this settlement. Our September 24, 1999 response is attached in two forms. One is a summary of the items we agree with and those where we have changes, including the reason for our changes. The second is a revision-marking of the September 15 proposal to show all the specific changes, including some minor edits. We have not included the tariff revisions to support this package, but will provide them once we have a final agreement. At this point, the changes to the prior tariff drafts are straight forward. Also attached is a draft Joint Motion for your review and approval. Our suggested approach is to have Settlement Parties sign the motion as the means of signifying their approval of the Settlement and the need for expeditious Commission action. We have scheduled a Settlement Conference next week on Tuesday, September 28, starting at 10:00 a.m. in Room 308, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco. HOWEVER, the attendance of a couple key parties is problematic, and we may need to move this settlement meeting to accommodate their schedules so we can ensure a productive day. We will advise you no later than Monday morning of the meeting status and possible next steps. We appreciate your continued active participation in this settlement process and look forward to your feedback on our modifications. Sincerely, Dan Thomas PG&E California Gas Transmission Manager, Products and Sales cc: Kirk Johnson Ben Campbell Patrick Golden Randy Litteneker Steve McCarty Chris McManus Roland Risser Dave Rubin Al Torres Ron Stoner Eric Eisenman Geoffrey Bellenger Attachments <<Sept 24 Summary of PG&E OFO Settlement Response.doc<< <<Sept 24 PG&E OFO Settlement Response.doc<< <<Sept 24 Draft Motion for OFO Settlement.doc<<
|