FYI Re Rate Stabilization Hearings---Getting rates secured for DWR

FYI. Looks like Peace is rattling the CPUC's cage pretty well. Let me kno=
w=20
if you'd like to respond and we can get Jeanne Bennet to throw something=20
together.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 07:22 PM -----

=09"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com<
=0903/20/2001 06:46 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com<, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com<,=20
<berry@apx.com<, <dcazalet@apx.com<, <billr@calpine.com<,=20
<jackp@calpine.com<, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com<, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com<,=
=20
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com<, <gtbl@dynegy.com<, <jmpa@dynegy.com<,=20
<jdasovic@enron.com<, <susan_j_mara@enron.com<, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com<,=
=20
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com<, <foothill@lmi.net<, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com<=
,=20
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com<, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com<,=20
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com<, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com<,=20
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com<
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: FYI Re Rate Stabilization Hearings

In a letter to the Commission dated March 14, 2001, the California =20
Department of Water Resources (DWR) expressed its views concerning the =20
determination of the California Procurement Adjustment (CPA).? (Copy =20
attached.)
The ALJ has issued the attached ruling stating that he will consider DWR=01=
,s =20
concerns in issuing a draft decision implementing an interim CPA, and in=20
order to so,?he has?modified the original schedule.? He will issue a draf=
t=20
decision as soon as practical.? In the interim, parties may file and serve=
=20
comments focused solely on DWR=01,s letter no later than 5:00 p.m. tomorro=
w.?=20
Nothing like giving folks lots of time to respond.? The email from the CPU=
C=20
went out at 4:08 this afternoon.
?
Dan
- CPUC01-#93188-v1-A0011038_et_al__DeUlloa_Ruling__.doc