![]() |
Enron Mail |
Jim/Jeanne:
Do we know what case this request has been made in and if we're one of the 5 listed? Thanks. Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:37 AM ----- "Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com< 03/16/2001 11:26 AM To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com<, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com<, <berry@apx.com<, <dcazalet@apx.com<, <billr@calpine.com<, <jackp@calpine.com<, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com<, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com<, <rjhickok@duke-energy.com<, <gtbl@dynegy.com<, <jmpa@dynegy.com<, <jdasovic@enron.com<, <susan_j_mara@enron.com<, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com<, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com<, <foothill@lmi.net<, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com<, <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com<, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com<, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com<, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com<, <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com< cc: Subject: Fwd: Point of Clafrification re: UCAN and RatePayers Request forHearings FYI re the request for CPUC hearings to investigate alleged price manipulation by generators. Dan ----- Message from Julesan@aol.com on Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:11:14 EST ----- To: huse@eesconsulting.com, mer@cpuc.ca.gov, pva@cpuc.ca.gov, awp@cpuc.ca.gov, cmw@cpuc.ca.gov, ctd@cpuc.ca.gov, dlf@cpuc.ca.gov, fua@cpuc.ca.gov, jlo@cpuc.ca.go cc: MEByrnes@aol.com Subject: Point of Clafrification re: UCAN and RatePayers Request for Hearings Greetings: UCAN and Ratepayers have filed a Request for Hearings regarding the actions of certain generation companies in connection with alleged manipulation of California's electricity markets by five pivotal market players.During an informal discussion with another party a question arose about whether the request for hearings included an examination of actions taken by SDG&E, PG&E or Southern California Edison in pursuing claims against alleged market manipulators. This filing is meant to clarify that UCAN and Ratepayers are not at this time requesting hearings into the actions of SDG& E, PG&E or Southern California Edison in pursuing any such claims they may enjoy. The requested hearings are proposed to focus on the whether the five pivotal market players had the ability to exercise significant market power so that operation of the new market institutions was distorted. Thank you for allowing UCAN and Ratepayers to clarify this point.
|