|
|
Enron Mail |
This is material that I received re: Nord Pool from Davies (one of
Schroeder's guys). If you want to take a wack at putting together a few bullets on what Nord Pool is, how it differs from Cal model and why it's preferable, that would help me immensely and free me up to focus on 1) comments to Gov's proposal and 2) more detail on demand buy-down. That possible? Let me know. Greatly appreciated. Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 09:43 AM ----- Philip Davies@ECT 01/02/2001 10:46 AM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Mark Schroeder Subject: Nord Pool Jeff, A couple of presentations attached which give you some quick info comparing the Nordic market to others, notably UK. The first is a presentation prepared for our Mexcian colleagues 18 months ago, drawing out key features and success factors in selected liberalised markets, including Nord Pool. The second overlaps a little with the first in terms of Nordic content and compares the NP arrangements to the existing and proposed new UK arrangements. This one is over 2 years old now. I would urge caution in using both of them to the extent that they are (particularly the latter) a little dated now. One very good non-Enron comparative source (although again not completely up to date), (sorted by market design issue rather than by market but including plenty on Nord Pool) can be found at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/elarch/aback.htm . Open the document dated Feb 98, comparing trading arrangements in "other countries" (than UK). This was prepared by the regulator in the early phase of the redesign of the UK market. Let us know if you need more help. Regards Philip Davies
|