Re: Conference Call -- January 16th

Harry:
Tamara Johnson left me a voicemail stating that 1) she phoned Bob
Weisenmiller requesting that he be our witness 2) there was disagreement
internally about whether Enron should have testimony 3) she nonetheless
wanted to try to make sure Bob was available and 4) she would call Bob back
to discuss further on Tuesday. Not sure that this is the best way to run a
railroad. As you mentioned, it's quite inefficient to have EES folks
contacting our lawyers and reg consultants directly. I did not respond to
Tamara's message--thought it would be better to pass along info to you. We
can discuss further on Tuesday.

Best,
Jeff

JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com<
01/12/2001 04:33 PM

To: "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com<, "'tjohnso8@enron.com'"
<tjohnso8@enron.com<, "'Harry.Kingerski@enron.com'"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com<, "'gsavage@enron.com'" <gsavage@enron.com<
cc: MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com<
Subject: Conference Call -- January 16th

I have set up a conference call for Tuesday, January 16th at 10:00 a.m. PST
to get our game plan together for testimony in the CPUC proceeding.

Dial in number is 800-403-2036
Participant Code is 298206

Jeanne Bennett