Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:douglas.condon@enron.com
Subject:Re: DA in PG&E and SCE?
Cc:eric.letke@enron.com, george.waidelich@enron.com
Bcc:eric.letke@enron.com, george.waidelich@enron.com
Date:Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:20:00 -0800 (PST)

Yes, but there's a commitment to reverse it in another bill (AB 27X) that=
=20
Debra Bowen is carrying. There is a helluvalot of uproar about that langua=
ge=20
in the bill and just about everyone is united to fix it. Keep your fingers=
=20
crossed, and we'll keep you posted.

Best,
Jeff



=09Douglas Condon@EES
=0902/02/2001 08:00 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George=20
Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: DA in PG&E and SCE?


Is this statement correct?


Another flea on this legislation is the suspension of new direct access=20
customers during the time that DWR is procuring energy.? The bill states, "=
=01(=20
the right of retail end use customers =01( to acquire service from other=20
providers shall be suspended until the department no longer supplies power=
=20
hereunder."? Voila.? Not only do we get a rate increase, but our ability to=
=20
choose an alternative energy supplier is hereby waived.? I would think the=
=20
average Californian would be outraged by that dictate.? Of course, most=20
Californians didn't know that they had a choice.? Therefore, the legislatio=
n=20
made a grand leap forward by lowering our opportunity set to be in line wit=
h?=20
expectations.=20

I wonder what the Legislature will do next week?=20