![]() |
Enron Mail |
Yes, but there's a commitment to reverse it in another bill (AB 27X) that=
=20 Debra Bowen is carrying. There is a helluvalot of uproar about that langua= ge=20 in the bill and just about everyone is united to fix it. Keep your fingers= =20 crossed, and we'll keep you posted. Best, Jeff =09Douglas Condon@EES =0902/02/2001 08:00 PM =09=09=20 =09=09 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George=20 Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES =09=09 cc:=20 =09=09 Subject: DA in PG&E and SCE? Is this statement correct? Another flea on this legislation is the suspension of new direct access=20 customers during the time that DWR is procuring energy.? The bill states, "= =01(=20 the right of retail end use customers =01( to acquire service from other=20 providers shall be suspended until the department no longer supplies power= =20 hereunder."? Voila.? Not only do we get a rate increase, but our ability to= =20 choose an alternative energy supplier is hereby waived.? I would think the= =20 average Californian would be outraged by that dictate.? Of course, most=20 Californians didn't know that they had a choice.? Therefore, the legislatio= n=20 made a grand leap forward by lowering our opportunity set to be in line wit= h?=20 expectations.=20 I wonder what the Legislature will do next week?=20
|