![]() |
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jeff Dasovich X-To: Harry Kingerski X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf That's a very good point. I'll make the change. Best, Jeff Harry Kingerski 12/26/2000 03:33 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th Jeff - instead of suggesting a specific rate increase - 10 or 15 %, I think we should acknowledge that a "modest" increase may be necessary and may in fact be desirable - but that the specific amount of increase should be reasoned and subject to well thought out evidence and hearings, not just determined by whim. In general, we should not be overly prescriptive at this point and I know you agree with that. Otherwise, I think you have captured the points excellently.
|