|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jeff Dasovich X-To: James D Steffes X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf Thanks. Good points. Will make sure that we have "bad guys" issued covered. You have a great holiday with your family and a safe and happy New Year. Best, Jeff James D Steffes 12/27/2000 09:29 AM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th Jeff -- Your notes look great. Best of luck today with the Hearings. Only items not included would be (1) information from the PX / ISO and (2) governance at the PX / ISO. I don't think these will are appropriate at these hearings. Finally, I think that if the Hearings begin to devolve into a "who are the bad guys", what are you proposing Mike Day respond? Do we have any messages for this situation (however unlikely)? Jim ----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 09:26 AM ----- Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 12/26/2000 07:05 PM To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, MDay@GMSSR.com, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th You're right, Sue. Rates can't go up w/out declaring the rate freeze over in some fashion---trying to finesse it. Thanks very much for the comments. Harry also had a good comment---don't specify the amount of rate increase in our comments; rather note that the rate increase needs to be well-reasoned and based on facts and evidence. Will make that change. Susan J Mara 12/26/2000 06:43 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, MDay@GMSSR.com, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th Jeff, This looks good. It comes across as moderate in tone-- although probably no one else will ask to leave the rate freeze in place. I have a legal question -- Under AB 1890, I don't see anyway that the CPUC can raise rates without ending the rate freeze first. Am I missing something? So, how is it clear that the CCPUC can raise the rates on Feb 1? It's clear,however, that once the retained assets are valued that the rates can be changed. Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 12/26/2000 01:15 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, MDay@GMSSR.com, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th Attached is a draft of the talking points for the Commission's hearings. Few points: Our time is likely to be limited to 5-10 minutes. Mike Day, our outside counsel, will make the presentation on our behalf. Mike Day is fleshing out the legal details of our presentation and he will forward that along for folks review later today. Comments can be forwarded to me via email, pager (888.916.7184), voicemail (415.782.7822), or home (415.621.8317). We will finalize the message points on tomorrow's daily call (10 AM CST). The call in number is 800.713.8600. Code is 80435. The Commission's hearings begin tomorrow at 10 AM (PST).
|