Re: Enron and Labor Relationships

I think the answer to #1 is: as much as possible, but I'm not altogether
certain--pretty sure that our preference would be to use our own internal
construction folks as much as possible. Answer to #2 would be very
interesting; I don't know the answer, but I'm sure that it's tightly linked
to the answer to #1. I think you might want to start with Shelly Corman to
find the right contact for the pipeline constructions.

I leave for S.D. tonite. I'll give you updates as the day transpires
tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff

James D Steffes
09/10/2000 12:50 PM
To: rick johnson@enron.com
cc: jeff dasovich, sandra mccubbin, richard shapiro
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Rick --

The information below is very helpful for Government Affairs across the
country. I have a few other questions to support our advocacy:

1. How much of our new power plant development is not subject to Building &
Construction Trade Labor Agreements?

2. Does Enron have any specific policies on whether or not we should use
Union labor on our construction? We recently established human rights and
environmental policies, I am wondering if this applied to Unions?

3. Do you know if the pipelines are also using Union labor on their
expansions? Or maybe, who could tell me?

Thanks.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/10/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich
09/08/2000 11:46 AM
To: Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron and Labor Relationships

Rick: Thanks very much.

Rick Johnson@ENRON
09/08/2000 11:35 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Jeff, per your recent voice mail, below you will find the labor relationship
summary that I prepared for Sandy.
Hope it is helpful, please call if I can be of any assistance. Rj.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
11:29 AM ---------------------------

Rick Johnson
08/29/2000 07:16 PM
To: Sandy McCubbin
cc:
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Sandy, I was again disapointed to hear that Union leaders are accusing Enron
as being unfriendly to Labor. In the last 20 months we have pursued
construction on over 3000 MW of new generation capacity.
Enron Development Activity subject to Building & Construction Trade Labor
Agreements
California
500 mw - PDEF - FeB. 99
750 mw - PEF - Feb. 2000
Indiana
550 mw- Westfork Development - Oct. 99
Illinois
680 mw - Lincoln Energy Facility - Nov 99
Tennessee
540 mw - Gleason Power I - Oct 99
Oregon
240 mw - Coyote II (planned January 2001)
Ethynol Plant - Columbia County - Baugh Const. June 2000

Hopefully this will prove to be valuable information: In addition to the
direct agreements, Enron is pursuing third party projects in Chicago and New
York City that will be subject to labor agreements.

If the parties are interested, feel free to have them contact me directly
503-464-7548
Regards, Rick Johnson