Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:jeffery.fawcett@enron.com
Subject:Re: Environmental Alert called off
Cc:susan.scott@enron.com
Bcc:susan.scott@enron.com
Date:Tue, 26 Sep 2000 03:23:00 -0700 (PDT)

Your honor, could the witness please explain the source of his information.
Couldn't be the Ford Excursion marketing department, could it?



Jeffery Fawcett
09/26/2000 10:13 AM

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Environmental Alert called off

Know of any openings??? With the GIR almost wrapped up, I'm looking for a
new challenge....


p.s. Purchase of the Excursion is defensible (barely), SoCal's "windowing"
practice is indefensible!





From: Jeff Dasovich on 09/26/2000 10:01 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Environmental Alert called off

Gee, with all due respect, this sounds like SoCal trying to justify its
windowing policy.

Have you considered a career as a PR exec with OPEC.

Affectionately yours,
Jeff



Jeffery Fawcett
09/26/2000 09:57 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Environmental Alert called off

Consider the facts:

- 80% of the materials in this vehicle's construction are recyclable.
- Although it weighs 7,200 lbs, it gets 14 mpg, city, 18 mpg, highway, better
than most 6-cylinder SUV's.
- It's the only SUV that has a "blocker beam," a sort of low-slung bumper
behind the front bumper designed to transfer the energy of an impact with a
small car directly onto the small car's rear bumper, mitigating the risk of
the Excursion riding up and over the smaller car. In addition, the standard
class V hitch is set low on the rear frame and, similar to the blocker beam
up front, is designed to absorb the energy of a rear crash.
- It is a high efficiency, smokeless turbo-charged diesel engine... although
diesels produce more particulates than gasoline engines, overall, they don't
produce nearly the pollution of a gas-fired engine. See below:


Diesel engine
In general terms the diesel engine is less polluting that the petrol engine,
it produces 25 times less carbon monoxide, 15 times less hydrocarbons without
burning and half as much nitrogen oxide, whereas the emissions of sulphur
dioxide are higher.

Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that when the load of the diesel
engine approaches the maximum, the formation of soot increases radically
(which may even go so far as to multiply the concentration of black lead by
20).

This phenomenon does not occur with petrol vehicles, in which the
concentration of particles in the exhaust gases is kept practically constant.
In order to prevent this, we can recycle part of the exhaust gases through
the air inlet and place filters in the exhaust in order to reduce the
emission of particles.
Comparative chart for the components of the exhaust
from a petrol engine and a diesel engine







Susan Scott
09/25/2000 05:05 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Environmental Alert


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 09/25/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 09/25/2000 05:03 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Environmental Alert

Oh great, he gets married, but his kids die from pollution.