Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:steven.kean@enron.com
Subject:Re: FERC preparation conference call
Cc:david.parquet@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com,mary.hain@enron.com, maureen.mcvicker@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com,
Bcc:david.parquet@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com,mary.hain@enron.com, maureen.mcvicker@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com,
Date:Tue, 7 Nov 2000 07:26:00 -0800 (PST)

Steve:

I'm not sure how far along you are with the comments, but California's
insistence on micro-managing utility purchases is really standing in the way
of developing a competitive, functional market. The prospect of having Ms.
Lynch in particular and the State of California generally as a counter party
in every transaction is a huge disincentive for the utilities to transact.
(Though the situation in California has now put the utilities into a "damn
the torpedoes" mode and persuaded them to transaction despite the regulatory
risk.)

Clearly, the first best answer is utility-out-of-the-merchant-function. But
given the political climate in California, we're likely to have the utility
in the role of buyer, at least in the near term. For the market to work in a
structure with utility as buyer, the CPUC and California need to get out of
the way. Otherwise, it's a never-ending quagmire.

A couple of PUCs ago, the CPUC set up an incentive mechanism for utility gas
procurement. Under that mechanism, a benchmark is set. If the utility beats
the benchmark, it shares the benefits with consumers. If it does worse than
the benchmark, it shares the pain with consumers. It's a model that works,
that's simple and that's compatible with competitive markets. It ain't
perfect, but it's head and shoulders above the regulator-as-counterparty that
the current PUC has put in place.

Given the brief time you'll have, there may be other more critical issues,
but this one is getting increasing attention out here in the land of lunacy.

Jeff



Steven J Kean
Sent by: Maureen McVicker
11/07/2000 02:26 PM

To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FERC preparation conference call

Although I realize some of you may not be able to join on such short notice,
please try to participate in a conference call in preparation for the FERC
meeting on Thursday. I'd really like to have your input.

Date: Wednesday, November 8
Time: 10 a.m. CST
Call in #: 888-422-7132
Host Code: 239900
Participant Code: 491703