![]() |
Enron Mail |
Cc: christian.yoder@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bcc: christian.yoder@enron.com X-From: Jeff Dasovich X-To: Christopher F Calger X-cc: Christian Yoder X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf I'm in the same boat. Somewhat messy. Might be useful for everyone to tak= e=20 a look and we can discuss tomorrow morning and determine if we want to file= =20 and what we'd say. Best, Jeff =09Christopher F Calger@ECT =0903/20/2001 07:26 PM =09=09 =09=09 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON =09=09 cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT =09=09 Subject: Re: FYI Re Rate Stabilization Hearings---Getting rates secu= red for=20 DWR I think we should respond, but I am not quite sure what we should say...I= =20 will read it. From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/20/2001 07:24 PM CST Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: =20 Subject: FYI Re Rate Stabilization Hearings---Getting rates secured for DWR FYI. Looks like Peace is rattling the CPUC's cage pretty well. Let me kno= w=20 if you'd like to respond and we can get Jeanne Bennet to throw something=20 together. ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 07:22 PM ----- =09"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com< =0903/20/2001 06:46 PM =09=09=20 =09=09 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com<, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com<,=20 <berry@apx.com<, <dcazalet@apx.com<, <billr@calpine.com<,=20 <jackp@calpine.com<, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com<, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com<,= =20 <rjhickok@duke-energy.com<, <gtbl@dynegy.com<, <jmpa@dynegy.com<,=20 <jdasovic@enron.com<, <susan_j_mara@enron.com<, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com<,= =20 <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com<, <foothill@lmi.net<, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com<= ,=20 <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com<, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com<,=20 <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com<, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com<,=20 <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com< =09=09 cc:=20 =09=09 Subject: FYI Re Rate Stabilization Hearings In a letter to the Commission dated March 14, 2001, the California =20 Department of Water Resources (DWR) expressed its views concerning the =20 determination of the California Procurement Adjustment (CPA).? (Copy =20 attached.) The ALJ has issued the attached ruling stating that he will consider DWR=01= ,s =20 concerns in issuing a draft decision implementing an interim CPA, and in=20 order to so,?he has?modified the original schedule.? He will issue a draf= t=20 decision as soon as practical.? In the interim, parties may file and serve= =20 comments focused solely on DWR=01,s letter no later than 5:00 p.m. tomorro= w.?=20 Nothing like giving folks lots of time to respond.? The email from the CPU= C=20 went out at 4:08 this afternoon. ? Dan - CPUC01-#93188-v1-A0011038_et_al__DeUlloa_Ruling__.doc
|