Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Thanks (as usual).
Best,
Jeff

Eric Letke@EES
03/20/2001 04:31 PM

To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

I talked with Hedy (sp?) Govenar this afternoon. Two developments: 1.)
"Noise" from Ms. Alpert's office has stopped. We believe initial reports
from Staff may have been overstated. 2.) Decisions on Enron's proposed
amendments are due today. Timing wouldn't not be right for a discussion with
me.

Action: Hedy is aware of the situation and has asked Staff to tell her of
any more occurrences. Hedy has my number and will be in touch with any
reports, at which time we will take action. For now, we will let the "dog"
sleep and lie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Letke/DUB/EES on 03/20/2001 04:20 PM
---------------------------

Enron Energy Services

From: Marty Sunde 03/20/2001 09:25 AM
Phone No: 713 853-7797 Phone
888-953-9478 SkyTel Pager
EB 889

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Jeff and Eric,
I have NO problem trying to get letters for support of Direct Access. Eric,
if we can get those to support Jeff and Sandi, this is wonderful.

Also, I had asked Eric to check with Alpert's office to register our follow
on phone number and offer to try to correct the aggravated customers. Eric,
if you can provide a status on all of these as you make progress, that's
appreciated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 03/20/2001 09:13
AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 07:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Marty: Thanks for the information.

Getting Eric's contact information to Alpert's office is in motion.
Regarding attempt to follow-up with those who called Alpert's office to
complain, I wasn't clear on that action. Likely makes sense for Eric to
coordinate with Sandi to make the contact with Alpert's office.
Letters are an attempt to influence Alpert to 1) fix the Direct Access
prohibition and 2) ensure that DA customers don't get saddled with the DWR
costs.

Let me know if this approach works.

Best,
Jeff

Marty Sunde@EES
03/19/2001 07:02 PM

To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

All I asked Eric to do was:
ensure that there was an Enron contact if another complaint came in.
find out from Alpert's office if we could call back a few of those who called
to complain to find out what they perceived, correct the misperception,
apologize.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 04:20 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com<, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, hgovenar@govadv.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, MDay@GMSSR.com, ken@kdscommunications.com, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Thanks, Scott.

Scott/Hedy/Sandi/Bev: Erik Letke heads up the retail marketing effort
underway in San Diego. Marty Sunde wants Alpert to have an EES commercial
contact that she can talk to in the event she has further questions, etc.,
He'd like Erki to be the contact person. Erik could you copy your vitals
(title, contact info) to Scott and Hedy Govenar and Sandi McCubbin so they
can forward along to Alpert?

Erik, seems that it would be useful if the customer letters to Alpert could
make the following points (folks please weigh in and add/subtract/modify if
needed):

The customer's glad to have had the option to take Direct Access service from
Enron because having the opportunity to take advantage of the offer has made
the customer better off.
Direct Access is an extremely important option that customers need, want and
should have going forward.
Any "solution" that the Legislature comes up with must therefore include the
continuation of Direct Access for all customers.
As such, the Legislature should immediately fix AB 1X to make sure that
Direct Access remains a permanent fixture of California's energy strategy.
Direct Access customers should not be forced to pay for DWR's power purchase
costs, since Direct Access customers aren't benefitting from those purchases.

Best,
Jeff

Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com<
03/19/2001 04:01 PM

To: Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com<
cc:
Subject: Dede

As discussed, customers should send letters to Dede as follows:

The Honrable Dede Alpert
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 5050
Sacramento, CA 95814

Interested companies should copy: "Honorable Members of the California
State Legislature" and fax or mail me a copy for further distribution.
My fax is (916) 448-0816 and my address is 1127 11th Street, Suite #400,
Sacramento, CA 95814.

Scott