Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:william.gang@enron.com
Subject:Re: Lead Time
Cc:charles.thompson@enron.com
Bcc:charles.thompson@enron.com
Date:Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:06:00 -0800 (PST)

What kind of contract?



William Gang@EES
02/28/2001 06:32 PM

To: Charles Thompson/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Lead Time

Think the 6-8 months is baloney. Can you verify?

Bill
---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 02/28/2001 04:31
PM ---------------------------


Weaver Paul Civ 95 CEG/CEOEE <Leo.Weaver@edwards.af.mil< on 02/28/2001
10:40:36 AM
To: "'William_gang@enron.com'" <William_gang@enron.com<
cc:
Subject: Lead Time


Bill,
Info...in recent talks SCE ventured the opinion that based on thier alleged
experience it would take 6 or 8 months to get a new contract cycled thru the
CPUC for approval and implementation. If this is true (which I doubt) it
could impact on the operational capability of our PDA which expires in 7
months. Do you folks agree it could not happen quicker. If need be, do you
know any strategy for getting thru that process quicker?
Paul