|
|
Enron Mail |
Greetings:
Sorry to bother you with this, but please see notes below. I need to find out who I can contact to get information on our noncore accounts. I'm assuming that you might know whom that would be. Thanks a million. Hope all's well. Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 10:03 AM ----- James D Foster@EES 03/16/2001 08:49 AM To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON cc: Catherine Woods/DUB/EES@EES Subject: Re: More Inquiries From CA PUC re: Switching customers back to LDC Good Morning Jeff, Catherine is out of the office until Tuesday 3/20/01. Not wanting to keep you waiting for a reply, I thought it best to give you some feedback immediately. The great majority of CAD's customers in CA are core. CAD does not knowingly terminate any current customer prior to their expiration date. The reasons why CAD's customers are turned back to the utility are as follows: 1) Upon receiving renewal pricing from the CAD rep, the customer chooses to return to the utility. 2) Understanding that the current minimum margin per meter for our customers is approximately $300, those customers that have extremely low annual volumes are sent attrition letters and turned back to the LDC, at the end of their contract. We cannot competitively price this type of customer versus the utility, and extract enough margin to support them. Currently in the California markets (PG&E, SDG&E, & SOCAL) , there exists approximately 50 customers that have usages so low that given current market conditions, we will not choose to renew the contracts. The expiration dates for these are between 5/30/2001 and 2/28/2005. 3) The customer initiates a request for termination prior to the end of their contractual expiration date. As we are all aware, California customers, specifically those with either an index or NYMEX product, experienced a large swing in their pricing during the past few months. CAD has been inundated with customers requesting to be returned to their LDC. Although we seek to satisfy our customer to the best of our ability, returning these customers to the utility is the LAST thing we want to do!!!!!!! The steps we have taken to address this issue is to: a) work with customer service/credit to offer extended payment options to ease the effect of the increase. b) offer to restructure the customer's contract, and reprice the customer on a fixed price product; minimizing their risk going forward. c) explain to the customer, in more detail, the reasons why this has occurred, and how, going forward, the index/NYMEX pricing has eased. Should you have additional questions, please reply or call. -Jim From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/15/2001 04:50 PM CST Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON To: Catherine Woods/DUB/EES@EES, Dennis Harris/DUB/EES@EES, James D Foster/DUB/EES@EES cc: Roger O Ponce/HOU/EES@EES, Catherine Woods/DUB/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, smccubbi@enron.com, smara@enron.com, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES Subject: More Inquiries From CA PUC re: Switching customers back to LDC Greetings: Recall that about 3 weeks we got a call from a CA PUC staffer asking whether we'd switched a particular gas customer (or two) back to the LDC. We looked into it and discovered that we'd mistakenly switched the customer back due to a mix up about the fact that the customer had two active meters behind two different utilities. We informed the PUC staffer of the mix-up and explained that the situation would be resolved. The questions from the staffer arose because the CA PUC made a bad decision a couple of months ago. When gas prices ran up at the California border a lot of large ("noncore") customers attempted to switch back to the utility tariff in the hope of lowering gas costs. In response, SoCalGas filed with the Commission asking the PUC to prohibit customers from switching back. The Commission agreed and put the prohibition in place. The Commission is now concerned that if suppliers terminate their contracts with customers (for whatever reason), or choose not to renew the contracts when they expire, customers won't have the option of returning to LDC service. Today, I received a letter from the President of the Commission asking me to respond to the following: Have you "stopped selling and delivering natural gas to any non-core customers with whom you have an existing procurement contract, or...notified any of your non-core customers that you do not intend to renew an existing natural gas commodity procurement contract. If your company has stopped or intends to stop serving non-core customers, the CPUC also needs to know how many contracts you have terminated or expect to terminate the natural gas volumes involved the location of the non-core customer(s) the reason(s) your company intends or has already acted to terminate those contracts." There's a good chance that the letter from the President of the Commission is linked to the fact that we've recently switched our electricity customers back to utility service in California. Prior to deciding whether and how to respond to the Commissioner, I'm trying to get handle on whether we're re-sourcing any gas retail customers to the utility prior to expiration, choosing not to renew contracts once they've expired, etc. Catherine, or Jim Foster, can you help out? Thanks. Best, Jeff
|