Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:harry.kingerski@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com,mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com
Subject:Re: PG&E strategy
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 03:26:00 -0700 (PDT)

Yes, agree that another call to weave in the comments we received from the
biz units would be useful. Can we shoot for Wednesday, when Mr. Kaufman will
be here in the SF office?



Harry Kingerski
09/25/2000 08:58 AM

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: PG&E strategy


----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 09/25/2000 08:56 AM -----

Harry Kingerski
09/25/2000 08:54 AM

To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: PG&E strategy

More feedback from Dennis .... I think this requires some
scrutiny/scrubbing. Also, I don't think it adheres to the "compromise" that
was struck among EES participants in the earlier discussion. I will pursue
conflict in EES. Jeff - think we need another conference call soon?

----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 09/25/2000 08:48 AM -----

Dennis Benevides@EES
09/24/2000 09:36 PM

To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: PG&E strategy



Please see comments on PG&E strategy. I have made some modifications to be
more consistent with the three main messages of the ISO MSC report dated
9/6/00. Any proposal should address the three messages of this report 1)
Eliminate mandatory UDC day ahead purchase requirement from PX (this may
allow generators to exercise mkt power during time periods of high demand)
and allow utilities to hedge forward purchases in bilateral markets at
shareholder risk, 2) Provide demand price signals in PG&E/SCE service
territories ASAP but no later than 10/1/2001 and 3) eliminate incentive for
large SCs to under schedule in ISO real time market (adopt ISO proposals for
imbalances in excess of 250 MW per hour).

Dennis


From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 09/21/2000 02:18 PM
To: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: PG&E strategy

Let me know how this looks. I'll be shopping it around Govt Affairs.