|
|
Enron Mail |
OK gang, she's hell bent, and I've spent about as much time as I'm willing on
this. Sorry about the hassle---Jimmie, if you hadn't used that colorful language, we wouldn't be in this mess. Anyway, unless I hear strong protests in the next 30 minutes, I'm writing back to say she can join (and has to do the next case all by her lonesome on the team's behalf as payback). Lemme know. Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/02/2000 04:21 PM ----- Christine Piesco <christine.piesco@oracle.com< 10/02/2000 02:39 PM To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: Teams Jeff, I appreciate your help. I sent a note to the Prof last week letting him know your concerns and asking him to verify once more that a group size of 5 was OK. I got his response today that it was. Apparently, my old group was the only one with 3, most of the others have at least 4. If there really is a lot of resistance I will ask the Professor to assign me randomly to a group. I would simply prefer to join one that I chose. I appreciate you're group's helping me out of this awkward spot, if they decide to let me in. Let me know, Thanks, Christine Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote: < Hi Christine: < < Yes, forwarded the email you sent last week. Here's where folks came out. < First, we think that the folks in your first group are mean. Second, it's < a real challenge managing a group of four and there's concern that five < will break the camel's back. Suggestion came up that it might be much more < mangageable if you could try to link up with a smaller group first. If < there's a problem finding a smaller group, then we could try to do five and < hope the ship don't sink? < < Sound reasonable? < < Best, < Jeff < < < Christine Piesco < <christine.piesco@o To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com < racle.com< cc: < Subject: Re: Teams < 10/02/2000 01:14 PM < < < < Jeff, < < Have you had a chance to convey what I said to the group, and can I join? < Professor Aceves was aware that I talked to you about joining your group, < and < he sent me an email asking to confirm that I was now in a group. I'd < certainly < like to be! As you know, I want to make sure I am in one to do the next < assignment with. Please let me know, so that if I am joining your group I < can < make the meetings and contribute to the next case. I do really appreciate < your < help. :) < < Thanks, < Christine < < Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote: < < < Christine: < < < < My apologies. My schedule melted down after we talked on Monday. Here's < < where folks came out. There's some concern about size. We're supposed < to < < be no larger than 3, but we lobbied Aceves and he apparently Ok'd our < < "oversized" group. The other folks in the group--who talked to him < < originally--are pretty sure that five will violate the rules. Folks < < wondered if there were other groups that are smaller than ours that you < < could hook up with. Sorry about that---it's a wrinkle that I didn't < think < < about when we spoke. If it gets real ugly trying to find a smaller < group, < < let me know. Fortunately there's not another team case due for two < weeks. < < < < Best, < < Jeff < < -- < Christine Piesco < Industrials Account Manager < Oracle Corporation < 500 Oracle Parkway < Redwood Shores, CA 94065 < Phone: (650) 506-3640 < Fax: (650) 633-3753 < christine.piesco@oracle.com < < (See attached file: christine.piesco.vcf) -- Christine Piesco Industrials Account Manager Oracle Corporation 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Phone: (650) 506-3640 Fax: (650) 633-3753 christine.piesco@oracle.com - christine.piesco.vcf
|