|
|
Enron Mail |
We'll need to discuss further internally, but they may be correct in their
assessment. Best, Jeff Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange 02/16/2001 07:03 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES Subject: UC/CSU issue - SB - 27X From further discussions with UC/CSU, it appears their primary concern relative to Enron's decision to De-DASR their accounts is that they have lost their "direct access" status, and are again a bundled utility customer. Jeff - what impacts does this status have with respect to the ban language of AB-1X? And with SB-27X, will they now encumber costs to become a direct access customer that they would not have been liable for had Enron not made the decision to return them to utility supply? Your input is appreciated. Please shed some light here as soon as possible. Regards - Tom Riley
|