SB 28x problems with the Republicans

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 06:20 PM -----

"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net<
04/25/2001 06:16 PM
Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

To: "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net<, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com<, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com<, "Robert Ross"
<robbiz@cwo.com<, "Rina Venturini" <rventurini@teamgsi.net<, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com<, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com<, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com<, "Marie Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net<,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com<, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com<,
"Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com<, "Fred Pownall"
<fred_pownall@ka-pow.com<, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com<, "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com<, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com<, "Anne Kelly"
<kelly@hnks.com<, "Mark Nobili" <mnobili@cal-lobby.com<, "Jan Smutny Jones"
<smutny@iepa.com<, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com<, "Katie Kaplan"
<kaplan@iepa.com<, "Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com<
cc: "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com<, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com<,
"Stephanie Newell" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com<, "Scott Sadler"
<sadlersa@earthlink.net<, "Sandi McCubbin" <smccubbi@enron.com<, "Roger
Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com<, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com<,
"Rachel King" <rachel.king@elpaso.com<, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com<, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com<, "Larrea,
John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com<, "kent Palmerton"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com<, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com<, "John
Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com<, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com<,
"Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com<, "Jean Munoz"
<jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com<, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com<, "Greg Blue"
<gtbl@dynegy.com<, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com<
Subject: SB 28x problems with the Republicans

FYI: In caucus today, the Senate Republicans decided to maintain a united
opposition to SB 28x (Sher) when it comes to the Senate floor tomorrow.
Their sole argument is against the unemployment insurance language inserted
by labor in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. If the bill fails to get
concurrence in the Assembly amendments, the bill will go to a conference
committee where this issue (and possibly others) will be hammered-out by
members of both houses.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net