Enron Mail

From:david.delainey@enron.com
To:fred.kelly@enron.com
Subject:Future GE forecast - John Schroeder
Cc:rob.milnthorp@enron.com, christopher.calger@enron.com,janet.dietrich@enron.com, raymond.bowen@enron.com, max.yzaguirre@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com
Bcc:rob.milnthorp@enron.com, christopher.calger@enron.com,janet.dietrich@enron.com, raymond.bowen@enron.com, max.yzaguirre@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com
Date:Thu, 3 Aug 2000 06:11:00 -0700 (PDT)

Fred, I will research our potential needs otherwise I agree with your
approach to keep the option open for as long as possible.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
01:09 PM ---------------------------


Fred L Kelly@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/03/2000 12:52 PM
To: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
John Garrison/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ken
Koye/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben F Jacoby@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Chappell@ECT, Larry
Reynolds/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John M
Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Eddie Clay/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Giblin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John M
Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David W Delainey@ECT, Brian
Stanley@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Future GE forecast - John Schroeder

Need input if anyone thinks we need more turbines than John Schroeder/GE has
forecasted. My gut feel is that John has forecasted more turbines than we
will need (which is OK).

The GE planning Boys called John and asked him to check with Enron....... and
determine if Enron wanted any turbines in the 2002/2003 timeframe (the
previous assumption being 7F's wouldn't be available till 4Q03, and 7EA's
wouldn't be available till 1Q03). John stated that he didn't know what the
request from Schenectady meant....., but....., maybe a few production slots
were coming available as things shake out..... John told them that he
thought Enron might be interested in:

qty 4 7EA's and qty 4 7F's for ESA
qty 2 7EA's and qty 2 7F's for Mexico
qty 6 7EA's and qty 6 7F's for NA

John is asking us........, "that would be enough...... right?". We don't
need to change that input (from John Schroeder to Schenectady) if we want
less than he forecasted, but....., if someone knows something I don't,
and....., we would want more turbines than the above......., please let us
know.

On an immediate basis, John also stated that he had requests in for turbines
for Saudi, and....., "an island project".

Regards - F.Kelly