Enron Mail

From:david.delainey@enron.com
To:wes.colwell@enron.com
Subject:Re: 2001 Plan
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 02:11:00 -0800 (PST)

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/27/2000 08:03 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

John Swafford spoke with David Vander in Wes' group last Tuesday and informed
him that, after reviewing matters, the Corp. State and Local Group had
reduced the charge to ENA from $821,000 to $321,000. This reduction goes far
to bringing costs in line with those from last year and, the remainder of the
increase, relates to the expansion of support at Corp. related to the
expansion of ENA's business. Best regards. Steve.



David W Delainey
11/22/2000 03:05 PM
To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

Steve, what is the status?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
03:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/13/2000 08:30 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

I spoke with Bob Hermann this afternoon and, in short, the single biggest
contributor to the increase in the corporate tax allocation relates to the
expansion of state and local tax support being provided to our new "business
verticals" - that is, Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets and
Enron Net Works - which expense should be specifically allocated to such
groups rather than ENA, as is currently the case. I will follow up with you
regarding the revised number after I have resolved the allocation issue.
Best regards. Steve.



David W Delainey
11/10/2000 12:53 PM
To: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 Plan

Guys, I noticed that the corporate tax allocation to ENA has more than
doubled from 2000 forecast to 2001 plan ie) $1,600,000 from $700,000. Could
you please explain. Our goal which is being met in ENA's direct expense
groups is to remain flat year or year from 2000 to 2001.

Regards
Delainey