|
|
Enron Mail |
Steve, what is the status?
Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 03:05 PM --------------------------- From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/13/2000 08:30 PM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: 2001 Plan I spoke with Bob Hermann this afternoon and, in short, the single biggest contributor to the increase in the corporate tax allocation relates to the expansion of state and local tax support being provided to our new "business verticals" - that is, Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets and Enron Net Works - which expense should be specifically allocated to such groups rather than ENA, as is currently the case. I will follow up with you regarding the revised number after I have resolved the allocation issue. Best regards. Steve. David W Delainey 11/10/2000 12:53 PM To: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: 2001 Plan Guys, I noticed that the corporate tax allocation to ENA has more than doubled from 2000 forecast to 2001 plan ie) $1,600,000 from $700,000. Could you please explain. Our goal which is being met in ENA's direct expense groups is to remain flat year or year from 2000 to 2001. Regards Delainey
|