|
|
Enron Mail |
To clarify the memo that I sent yesterday concerning Buyer vs. Seller on
Intercompany deals, I want to make sure that everyone understands that not only will the Seller side post on the SITARA deal but that the Volume Feedback Reconciliation report will reflect the error(s) associated with the buy side as well. It will no longer show the the error(s) generated by the sales side as it currently does. This change will coincide with the way SAP reports Intercompany transactions. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Note: The Volume Feedback Reconciliation report is the report which I distribute on a daily basis. Thanks, RHP ---------------------- Forwarded by Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000 10:20 AM --------------------------- Regina Perkins 02/03/2000 05:32 PM To: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Francis S Lim/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Buyer vs. Seller on Intercompany Deals It has been brought to my attention that SAP will not use the Buyer as the governing value associated with Intercompany deals but the Seller. Currently, SITARA captures the volume bridged back on the buy side not the sales side. I wanted to make sure that those of you who would be impacted by the change were aware of how SITARA would reflected the volumes associated with Intercompany deals. If there are any concerns with this, please let me know as soon as possible. I will need to have an adjustment made to the Volume Feedback Reconciliation report to reflect this change once it has been finalized. It may be a month or two before this is implemented but I wanted to make sure everyone had advance notice. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at X39222. Thanks, RHP
|