|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Daren J Farmer X-To: Lauri A Allen X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf No, we have transported on Tejas a few times this year also (on and off). Carlos should be able to tell you when. D Lauri A Allen 08/17/2000 03:27 PM To: dfarmer@enron.com cc: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Tejas Invoice - Deal 120987 Meter 6290/905 (Tejas Gas Pipeline) Oct 99 Daren- Was 10/99 the only month we transported this Carthage gas on Tejas? ---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 03:20 PM --------------------------- Mary Poorman@ENRON 08/17/2000 02:55 PM To: Gregory Steagall/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kellie Bilski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Tejas Invoice - Deal 120987 Meter 6290/905 (Tejas Gas Pipeline) Oct 99 I phoned Doug Trachta at Tejas regarding this issue. I appears that nominations were made under ENA's agreement 6520 on Tejas Pipeline Company from Carthage to Indian Hills. However, both of these points are actually on the Tejas Gas Operating. ENA doesn't have an agreement to ship on Operating, but HPL does. I think we need to set up an accounting arrangement to accomodate this deal, it appears as though ENA would be "piggy-backing" on HPL's agreement as they actually own the gas. It appears as though we need to move the volumes from Pipeline to Operating, at the very least. How have other months been handled with respect to this transport? Please let me know if I may be of any further assistance in resolving this deal. Mary ext. 35251
|