![]() |
Enron Mail |
HPLC - ENA-IM Texas, HPLR IM Texas, HPLR IM Waha, HPLR Affiliate, CES IM Texas, CES HPLC Texas, HPLR IM Liquids Division, ENA IM Wellhead Texas, ENA FT Wellhead Texas, ENA FT-Texas, ENA FT-South Texas, ENA Synthetic Texas.
That should leave in ENA ... Cleburne, Lonestar, Katy, Carthage and ENA IM Waha (there should be a ENA FT-Waha also). Dave -----Original Message----- From: Severson, Russ Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:02 PM To: Baumbach, David Cc: Hall, Bob M; Yanowski, Tommy J.; Grant, George Subject: HPLC Desk: This is the complete list of "Texas" business units. Can I get an exact list of which ones should go to HPLC. If a Firm book is not in their security, if they have a hedge with that book it will put the deal in pending until someone with "Texas" access approves it. [Dave Baumbach] Thanks Russ ---------------------- Forwarded by Russ Severson/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 02:56 PM --------------------------- Russ Severson 05/22/2001 02:20 PM To: David Baumbach/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON cc: Bob M Hall/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy Yanowski/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: HPLC Desk: << OLE Object: StdOleLink << I am still waiting on the full list of all the business units that roll up under Texas. However, the information I have received indicates that the HPLR desks are falling out under Texas. The positions Ed Terry is looking at contain HPLR in the portfolio. Should these be moved as well to HPLC. If we remove Texas access to AEP, all the portfolios with HPLR will not be able to be run by AEP. Russ From: David Baumbach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/22/2001 09:08 AM To: Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob M Hall/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: Russ, please wait until after trading to move ENA - IM Texas to the HPLC desk. We are concerned that it will affect our positions ... if not, then move it when you can. Thanks. Dave <Embedded Picture (Metafile)< <Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)<
|