|
|
Enron Mail |
Please note that I have re-formatted the attachment to an excel spreadsheet.
Try the attachment and let me know if you have any problems. Also, in discussion with Duke, TXU Fuel Co. does not have a transportation agreement with Duke for the redelivery of this gas. The agreement is between Enron and Duke. According to Brian Kerns of Duke, they basically took assignment of the existing transportation agreement Enron had with PG&E (now El Paso). If this is the case, then we should be using the nominated amount as the driver towards meeting our monthly minimum purchase obligation. Any imbalance between Enron and Duke on the Duke system receipts would be transparent to TXU and worked out between Enron and Duke. Any imbalance between the nominated volumed and the actual volumes received at the "Teco Tap" would need to be worked out between Enron and TXU Fuel Co. There are a couple of different ways to work this out, but I need to review the contract first. Please look at this on your side and lets come to an agreement as soon as possible since the end of the month is quickly approaching. Thanks, CCS (See attached file: DukeTecoTap.xls) ---------------------- Forwarded by Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities on 02/22/2001 02:03 PM --------------------------- "Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com< on 02/22/2001 10:36:27 AM To: David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU cc: Subject: BTU CHANGE My gas control has just notified me that the btu factor I should be using at your point should be 1.027 and not the 1.035 I have used so far. Below are the volumes as they appear in our system. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. (Embedded image moved to file: pic17578.pcx) - pic17578.pcx - DukeTecoTap.xls
|