|
|
Enron Mail |
One other comment. It is still not clear how MT values in excess of the 100
hours will be handled. Is EWC to be penalized for these "excess hours"? Hopefully this will be a moot or trivial question. From: Ilan Caplan on 04/17/2002 04:22 PM To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Clipper Availability Edits Hollis - Per our last phone call, I made the changes (in red) to the Clipper Availability to suite what I believe is a good definition for us (incorporates Mark(s) comments which I added). Please review and comment so I can send this file on to Mark Eilers. Please view this document in a Commercial light as spoke, thus looking at what favors EWC. Please call to discuss. Thanks, Ilan PS - Dave Schulgen put together a chart which outlines EWC maintenance costs per year for 1.5 maintenance. His work indicates that 72 hours (rather than 36/48) should be the standard (with an increase in the later years for additional work). This is reflected in the attachment.
|