|
|
Enron Mail |
Mark F,
Let's discuss. HK ---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 05/14/2002 05:41 PM --------------------------- From: Ilan Caplan on 05/14/2002 05:10 PM To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON cc: Benjamin Bell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Alan Nueman/EWC/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Fleet Availability Request Hollis - What is the process for us to go through and calculate the "Vestas" availability as we previously defined, similar to Ben's description below? AWEA is the goal. This would be a high priority. Lets discuss. Be well, Ilan ---------------------- Forwarded by Ilan Caplan/EWC/Enron on 05/14/2002 05:21 PM --------------------------- Benjamin Bell 05/14/2002 05:04 PM Sent by: Benjamin Bell To: Ilan Caplan/EWC/Enron@Enron cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Becky Bayne/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Alan Nueman/EWC/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Fleet Availability Request Thanks Ilan, excellent; please copy me on future numbers. Have you been able to determine what these numbers would look like using Vestas' definition of availability: Hours of Wind Turbine in Operation mode X 100 / Hours of Grid in Operation Mode. I sure would like to be able to present an apples-to-apples comparison at AWEA 2002. Ben
|